<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the D-FA 50 f1.0 lens really exist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://k-rumors.com/does-the-d-fa-50-f10-lens-really-exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://k-rumors.com/does-the-d-fa-50-f10-lens-really-exist/</link>
	<description>Pentax and Samsung K-mount rumors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:20:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichyX</title>
		<link>http://k-rumors.com/does-the-d-fa-50-f10-lens-really-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>RichyX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k-rumors.com/?p=139#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>Mistral75, there&#039;s nothing odd about it having a petal hood.
The old FA 35mm, 50mm and several others have petal hoods. 
Even some of the new DAs like the 15mm f/4 have a petal hood of sorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistral75, there&#8217;s nothing odd about it having a petal hood.<br />
The old FA 35mm, 50mm and several others have petal hoods.<br />
Even some of the new DAs like the 15mm f/4 have a petal hood of sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbie only.</title>
		<link>http://k-rumors.com/does-the-d-fa-50-f10-lens-really-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbie only.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k-rumors.com/?p=139#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to have one if it does really exist.
But I&#039;ve a few questions to the rumor,
First, if the old leaked image from the Pentax K-7 showing a 1.0 aperture on the top LCD was taken under a real condition (LENS-ON), why the ISO level was set to 1250 when the F-number was already 1.0 and at a speed of 1/8000S (MAX. SPEED)? Even in M mode seems that there should provide no ground for such a test?
Also, why would PENTAX produce a &quot;D-FA&quot; nowadays? Shouldn&#039;t she concentrate on the production of DA Limited, DA Star &amp; DA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to have one if it does really exist.<br />
But I&#8217;ve a few questions to the rumor,<br />
First, if the old leaked image from the Pentax K-7 showing a 1.0 aperture on the top LCD was taken under a real condition (LENS-ON), why the ISO level was set to 1250 when the F-number was already 1.0 and at a speed of 1/8000S (MAX. SPEED)? Even in M mode seems that there should provide no ground for such a test?<br />
Also, why would PENTAX produce a &#8220;D-FA&#8221; nowadays? Shouldn&#8217;t she concentrate on the production of DA Limited, DA Star &amp; DA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mistral75</title>
		<link>http://k-rumors.com/does-the-d-fa-50-f10-lens-really-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Mistral75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://k-rumors.com/?p=139#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Funny thing that this fixed focal length lens would have a petal-shaped zoom hood, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing that this fixed focal length lens would have a petal-shaped zoom hood, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

